Home » Bundesgerichtshof » Bundespatentgericht » European patent law » German civil procedure » German Federal Court of Justice » BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again

Rabu, 12 Oktober 2016

BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again

BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again - To all visitors of this blog, I say welcome and thank you for visiting the blog Tech News Today Look for all the things you need that are available on this blog. If not available, please leave suggestions and comments for the development of this blog. now we will discuss first about BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again we have collected a lot of information from sources to create this article, so please see.

Articles : BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again
full Link : BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again
Article Bundesgerichtshof, Article Bundespatentgericht, Article European patent law, Article German civil procedure, Article German Federal Court of Justice,

BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again

In two decisions published yesterday on its website, the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH) overturned two decisions by the Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht) invalidating the patents in suit for lack of novelty. Both decisions are remarkable not because they break new ground in (patent) law (they don't), but rather because the BGH corrects the fact finding of the lower court and finds in favour of the patentees. They fuel the impression that the Federal Court of Justice is more patent-friendly than the Bundespatentgericht, or, to put it another way, that the Federal Patent Court has become overly strict.

In the first decision, designated a leading case (Leitsatzentscheidung) by the Court, the BGH finds that a key witness lacked credibility and concludes that the public prior use which led the Federal Patent Court to invalidate the patent for lack of novelty was not established. The patent at issue was Nichia's EP 936 682, an important patent concerning white light emitting diodes that has also been the subject of opposition proceedings before the EPO. The decision is remarkable because the Federal Court of Justice is bound by the fact finding of the lower court unless there are specific doubts regarding the correctness and completeness of the fact finding (§ 529(1) Civil Procedure Act). The Court held that there were specific doubts as to the credibility of a key witness for the public prior use, whose testimony was inconsistent with that of other witnesses and established facts. The twist was that the witness had died in the meantime and could not be questioned again. This, so the BGH, did not preclude it from finding the testimony unpersuasive. After it had concluded that public prior use was not proven, the Court assessed inventive step based on the record before it and found the subject matter(s) of the claims to be inventive.

Fig. 1 of EP 1 389 985

In the second decision, the Federal Patent Court had found that claim 1 of EP 1 389 985 concerning a lower leg orthosis lacked novelty over the German utility model DE 299 08 981. It upheld an auxiliary claim. The patentee appealed. The Federal Court of Justice held that the lower court had misconstrued the disclosure of the allegedly novelty destroying document and that the document failed to disclose all the features of the invention. It then went on to assess novelty over two additional documents, also finding the invention not anticipated, and assessed inventive step in a single paragraph, concluding the plaintiff had failed to show lack of inventive step. Again the patentee prevailed on appeal.

information BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again has been completed in the discussion.

hopefully the article we give the title BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again can provide knowledge for you in living everyday life in determining the gadget that suits your needs.

you just read the article about BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again if this article is useful for you and want to bookmark it or share it please use the link https://sihanandi.blogspot.com/2016/10/bgh-rules-for-patentees-on-appeal-again.html?m=1 thank you and do not forget to comment if anyone.